February 21 LEMONS
Jeremy you are so right. It seems to me that I may have two different two modes of painting or processing of images, to develop.
1) Direct painting of what I see, ala prima small studies, that trend to stifle my creativity in composition because I am focused on what is front of me. I find it difficult to break out of this mode when painting directly from the subject and I am not sure that I should try to at the moment, but I take your point about tonal and compositional studies
2) Using the small, directly painted studies in (1) and photographs, as a departure point for larger, more creative paintings. First investigating the subject with charcoal drawings as you suggest, and then with larger paintings in another medium, say pastels. This can be a much slower process, more reflective even like meditation often requiring modification at my thoughts develop.
Thanks for your helpful advice
Cheers
Bob
Hi Bob
I started out as a landscape artist painting basically what was in front of me. It has taken me years to get away from painting what I see. First changing the colours, then distorting, then adding imaginary features, then imaginary landscapes based on memory and trying to incorporate figures (large) on an entirely imaginary basis. Its all part of the journey I suppose.
The key thing for me now is to stop looking at the original scene and let the painting take over. So I just make the changes that I feel I should make. I work with the painting upside-down a lot.
Jeremy










Recent Comments