Garratt Rd Bridge 18 April
I decide not to remove the tree instead, my aim was to stop the painting jumping, to take bridge back in space and to focus the eye under and through the bridge.
Not sure if it was a wise move
Hi Bob
Sorry I have been off the air for so long but the last few weeks have been difficult for me.
I am not sure what to say about the painting. I can tell you that the friend I am staying with looked over my shoulder just now to look at your painting and said “That’s lovely!”
I think that you are right not to remove the tree as it adds interest to the work as well as creating a sense of depth. In general the painting a bit lacking in interest especially on the left hand side. As always with your work it has interesting brush strokes, tonal variations and muted colours, but the pattern of shapes is not very exciting.
Basically you have a series of large parallel horizontal rectangles broken up into smaller vertical rectangles with the circular tree on the right hand side. It would be nice to have more variation in the shapes.
Working through it, I think the tree does cause a problem as it’s so different from the rest of the painting both in colour and shape, but if you took it out the work would be too empty. I am not sure how you can address this problem.
I think you need to do something about the colour of the tree so that you have more consistency in colour across the board. I would bring more pinks and blues into the foliage and possible bring some more yellows and greens into the rest of the painting say in the sky, the water or around the base of the piers.
The long horizontal pink rectangle formed by the side of the bridge needs breaking up on the left hand side but I am not sure how to do it, maybe some tonal variation making it darker on the left? Maybe just colour variation.
I love the piers but I want to be able to see more of the distant views under the bridge so on the left I would open them up more to allow the eye to see the distant shore. I think that you are right to make the focal point of the painting the distant shore because that’s what makes it interesting.
I think the railings on top of the bridge have the same problem as the pink rectangle below in that they are too regular and lacking in interest. They need breaking up in some way. It’s also a bit difficult to work out what they are. Sometimes they look like distant buildings to me.
The curve of the boundary between land and river doesn’t quite look convincing especially on the left. Again I am not quite sure why I feel this, maybe its just too regular.
It’s a pleasant painting as it is Bob and I don’t like to appear to be too critical but I can only assist by making suggestions that might take it to a higher level.
Jeremy






Recent Comments